Search Results for "res judicata not made out"

928 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 928 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice by Employer. Company's denial of permanency to 15 workmen held not to constitute unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 as workmen failed to prove continuous service.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Association of General Workers, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated November 20,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Executing Court's Refusal to Reopen Partition Decree Based on Will. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind a Final Decree to Redetermine Shares on Basis of Alleged Will Produced After Decree Became Absolute.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the Executing Court rejecting an application for framing of issues and modifi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit for Non-Prosecution. Appeal under Section 96 CPC dismissed as appellants failed to appear and no grounds were made out to interfere with the trial court's judgment.

The present First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging a judgment and decree passed by the trial court....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Execution Objection Case — Upholds Summary Rejection of Objection Petition Under Order 21 Rule 97 CPC. Executing Court Not Required to Adjudicate Title When Objection is Frivolous and Collusive.

The appellant, Kamal W/o Vishwanath Jadhav, filed a second appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2025 passed by the first appellate C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Petitioners Challenging Modifications to Development Control Regulations for Greater Bombay, 1991 Under Section 37 of MRTP Act. Petitioners Allege Amendments Are Not Minor, Ultra Vires, and Violate Right to Clean Environment Under Article 21.

Seven petitioners, all tax payers and rate-payers of the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, filed a writ petition u...