Search Results for "presiding officer absence"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "presiding officer absence"

1059 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1059 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income Reassessed at Rs.4,500 per Month. The Court held that the Tribunal's assessment of income at Rs.3,000 per month was low and enhanced it to Rs.4,500, applying a multiplier of 13 and deducting 1/3rd for personal expenses, resulting in total compensation of Rs.4,82,500.

19 Feb 2014

The appeal was filed by the husband of the deceased, Smt. Sunandamma, who died in a motor vehicle accident on 23.06.2006. The claimants, including the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Declaration and Injunction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Substantial Question of Law Must Arise for Interference in Second Appeal; Mere Appreciation of Evidence Not Sufficient.

25 Mar 2014

The appellants, who were defendants 3 and 4 in the original suit O.S.No.39/2003, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedur...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Petition Without Considering Evidence. Claimant Entitled to Compensation for Injuries Sustained in Road Traffic Accident Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

22 Apr 2014

The appellant, Mr. Vijay V. Shetty, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Shimoga, seeking compensation for injuries susta...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition Against Commercial Court in Arbitration Matter. Commercial Court's Jurisdiction Upheld Under Section 2(1)(c) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and Petitioner Estopped from Challenging Jurisdiction After Having Earlier Invoked It.

2 Jun 2023

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of prohibition to restrain the LXXXV Additional City Civil a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment in Letters Patent Appeal Filed by Terminated Employees Against Single Judge's Order. Model Standing Orders Dispute: Whether Rule 32 Excludes Clause 4A Protection for Probationers Who Were Initially Trainees.

27 Apr 2026

This Letters Patent Appeal arose from the dismissal of a writ petition by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which had upheld the termination of...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Involving Allegation of Fraudulent Sale by Forged Power of Attorney. The Appeal Challenges Reversal of Trial Court's Decree by First Appellate Court.

19 Dec 2024

Background: This matter arises from a Regular Second Appeal filed by the plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Writ Petition Quashing Reinstatement of Vocational Instructor Due to Lack of Essential Qualification. Possession of Instructor's Training Certificate from Central Training Institute for Instructors is a Mandatory Requirement Under Item 8(ii) of Part III of Schedule B to MEPS Rules for Appointment as Full-Time Instructor.

25 Nov 2011

The petitioners, an educational society and its junior college, challenged the judgment of the School Tribunal, Amravati, which had allowed the appeal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Overrules Earlier View on Small Cause Court Jurisdiction — Holds That Investment Under Section 28 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 Does Not Confer Unlimited Pecuniary Jurisdiction. The court ruled that the pecuniary ceiling under Section 26 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 applies to courts invested with small cause powers under Section 28 of the 1869 Act, overruling Salimkhan v. Mohammad Ibrahimkhan.

5 Oct 2010

The case arose from a reference by a learned Single Judge (Shri B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.) who disagreed with an earlier decision in Salimkhan v. Mohamma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Simple Hurt in Rape Case Acquittal Appeal — Appellants Acquitted of Rape but Convicted Under Section 323 IPC for Assaulting Prosecutrix.

30 Nov 2010

The appellants, Sonu Babu Pival and Kanta Sonu Pival, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Pune on 14.8.1996 in Sessions Case No.379 of 1995. They we...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Iron Ore Sale Dispute Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause in MOU and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles applicant to seek court's intervention.

6 Dec 2013

The applicant, M/s. Hira Steel Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of...

53 54 55 56 57

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)