Search Results for "minority members"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "minority members"

626 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 626 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Conviction for Offences Under IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Arms Act, and UAPA. Appellant Challenges Trial Court Findings Alleging Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Lapses.

29 Nov 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules on Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Under Section 26 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015. The Mere Filing of a Section 34 Petition Does Not Trigger Automatic Stay; Award-Holder Can Execute Unless Stay Granted.

3 Mar 2017

The snippet of the judgment deals with Chamber Summonses in Execution Applications arising from an arbitral award. The dispute involves Enercon GmbH a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.

13 Feb 2020

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MUDA Allotment of Civic Amenities Site. Allotment to Second Respondent Upheld as Decision-Making Process Found Free from Illegality, Irrationality, or Procedural Impropriety.

13 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from the allotment of a civic amenity site by the Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA). Pursuant to a public notification dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Addresses Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator; Validity of 20% Claim Cap Clause Under Scrutiny. The Court Examines Whether a Contractual Condition Limiting Arbitration to Claims Not Exceeding 20% of Contract Value Is Arbitrary and Discriminatory.

28 Jan 2026

The dispute arose from a contract dated 7 May 2018 between a contractor and the Central Railways for the preparation of design and structural drawings...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

8 Mar 2016

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

53 54 55 56 57

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)