Search Results for "co-operative court jurisdiction"

2346 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2346 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute Case — Termination of Workmen Held Illegal for Non-Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Employer Failed to Prove Abandonment of Service by Workmen, and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

The appellant, M/s. Indo-European Breweries Ltd, filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3212...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Consumer Forum Order Against Credit Society for Deficiency in Service. Fixed Deposit Holder is a Consumer Under Section 2(1) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The petitioners, including the Kala Hanuman Urban Credit Society and its directors, challenged an order dated 25 February 2009 passed by the District ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cooperative Housing Societies in Section 9 Arbitration Petitions Against Federation and Developer. Termination of Bipartite MoU and Cancellation of MHADA Layout NOC Eroded Foundation of Tripartite Development Agreement, Meriting Interim Protection from Interference.

These were two commercial arbitration petitions filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Borivali Shree Ganesh Nateshwa...