Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1515 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1515 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Application Under Section 33 for Additional Award Does Not Extend Limitation Period.

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an order of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Execution Case — Order Dismissing Section 47 Application Set Aside. Execution Court's Failure to Consider Objections Regarding Arbitral Award's Enforceability Constitutes Jurisdictional Error Under Section 115 CPC.

The present Civil Revision Petition was filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the order dated 19.03.2022 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award on Ground Not Raised by Petitioner. Court holds that a party cannot challenge an arbitral award on a ground that only aggrieves the opposite party, who has not challenged the award.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge on a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favour of Constituent in Stock Trading Dispute. Court upholds award based on documentary evidence and rejects challenge under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, M/s. Angel Capital & Debt Market Ltd., a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited, challenged an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds award granting 7% revenue share and costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses.

The petitioner, Taj Air Ltd. (formerly Megapode Airlines Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Landowners Challenging Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Dispute. Disputes under Development Agreements Held Arbitrable Due to Existence of Arbitration Clause Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment pertains to two arbitration appeals (Arbitration Appeal No. 102 of 2024 and Arbitration Appeal No. 101 of 2024) along with interim applic...