Search Results for "additional security deposit"

1181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to prove that the cheque dated 06.03.2004 was issued towards a debt or liability that existed on that date, as the liability arose only after 50 days from the contract date.

The appellant, Kala Mines and Minerals, a partnership concern, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge by Drug Supplier Against Blacklisting Order Alleging Non-Compliance with Rule 26A of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000. Petitioner Assails Blacklisting as Ultra Vires in Absence of Corrupt Practice Finding and Procedural Violation.

The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — National Textile Corporation Ltd. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. — Held that the Trial Court erred in dismissing the suit for recovery of money without considering the evidence on record and the terms of the insurance policy.

The appellant, National Textile Corporation Ltd., a government company, filed a suit for recovery of money against the respondents, United India Insur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust Regarding Tender Process and Price Bid Opening. Petitioner Challenges Disqualification and Award of Contract to Third Respondent Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s.Coresonant Systems Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender floated by V.O. Chidambaranar Port Trust, Tuticorin, for implementation of ...