Search Results for "Void Order"

5102 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5102 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn in Company Law Dispute Over Shareholding and Project Implementation. Parties Agreed to Settle Dispute and Withdraw Appeal, Resulting in Dismissal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The present appeal was filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 against an order of the Company Law Board dated 8.12.2000. The dispute perta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees Appointed Without Following Statutory Recruitment Rules in Education Sector. Appointments Made Without Approval of Competent Authority and Without Following Reservation Policy Are Void Ab Initio.

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, disposed of four writ petitions filed by employees challenging their termination from service. The petitioners we...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Magistrate's Order for Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in Sugar Factory Dispute. Holds That Private Complaint Must Be Examined Under Chapter XV CrPC Before Directing Investigation, as the Dispute Is Civil in Nature and Does Not Warrant Immediate Police Action.

The judgment arises from two connected criminal writ petitions concerning a dispute between a sugar factory (Padmashree Dr. Vitthalrao Vikhe Patil Sah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Plaint Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata as Earlier Suit Was Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit.

The applicant, original defendant No.1 in S.C.S. No.5055/2012, filed a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Forest Guards in Promotion Dispute — Circular Revocation Invalid Without Proper Rescission. State Government's Order Dated 14.05.2009 Did Not Revoke Earlier Circular of 17.10.1977; Subsequent Revocation Order Dated 11.06.2012 Was Not Given Retrospective Effect.

The case involves two appeals by Forest Guards, Omkar Sinha and another, against the State of Chhattisgarh and others, concerning their entitlement to...