Search Results for "Registered User Agreement"

578 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 578 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Claiming Easementary Rights Over 20ft Wide Road — Pleadings Must Specifically Allege 20-Year User for Prescription Under Section 15 of Indian Easements Act, 1882. Easement of Necessity Requires Proof of Absolute Necessity and Common Origin, Which Was Not Established.

The dispute pertains to easementary rights over a 20ft wide road situated on land Survey No.57 Hissa No.13A/1 owned by the respondents (Ramani's). The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in MODVAT Credit Deduction Case Under Section 43B of Income Tax Act. Unutilised MODVAT Credit and Sales Tax Recoverable Account Not Allowable as Deduction Without Actual Payment of Excise Duty Liability.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. against the Delhi High Court judgment dated 07.12.2017, which upheld the disallowance ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Pharmacy Council of India's Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Pharmacy Education, Overriding AICTE. The Pharmacy Act, 1948 is a complete code, and the word 'pharmacy' in Section 2(g) of the AICTE Act must be read down to exclude AICTE's regulatory power.

The Supreme Court adjudicated a batch of cases concerning the regulatory authority over pharmacy education in India. The dispute arose when the Pharma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Flyover Construction on Environmental Grounds — Held That Project Did Not Require Environmental Clearance as It Was a Linear Project on Existing Highway.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the construction of a flyover and road widening project on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Accused in UAPA and BNS Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 13 of UAPA — Failure to Obtain Prior Approval from Central Government Renders Investigation Invalid

The case involves two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR in Cri...