Search Results for "Aurangabad bench"

6533 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6533 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Bar Council Elections and Advocate General's Ex-Officio Membership. Court upholds Advocate General's membership in Bar Council under Section 55 of Advocates Act, 1961 and dismisses allegations of electoral irregularities.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the composition and election of the Bar Council of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as last seen witness testimony was unnatural and contradictory.

The appellant, Nazira w/o Anwarkhan, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 9th February 2001 in Sessions Case No.305 of 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal for Nullity of Marriage Under Section 11 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Due to Wife's Subsisting Marriage. Wife's Appeal for Maintenance Dismissed as Marriage Void Ab Initio.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a judgment of the Family Court, Aurangabad, in Petition No. B-1/2010. The husband, Dheeraj Patil, fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Finalization of Ward Formation and Conduct of Elections for Nagar Panchayat Phulambri. The court held that the respondents must comply with the directives in the letter dated 04.08.2015 to finalize ward formation and hold elections within specified time frames.

The petitioners, residents of Phulambri, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to finalize ward formation and conduct elections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 read with Section 3 of POCSO Act set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The case involves three appellants: Ganesh @ Gorakh Tatyarao Jadhav (original accused No. 1), Muskan w/o Shaikh Rashid @ Rafiq (original accused No. 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Married Sisters in Dowry Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Section 498A IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 - No Prima Facie Case Made Out Against Applicants Who Were Married Sisters Living Separately.

The applicants, who are married sisters of the husband (applicant No. 6), filed a criminal application under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Divorce Appeal in Mental Disorder Case, Upholds Wife's Restitution of Conjugal Rights. Allegations of Schizophrenia and Paranoid Personality Disorder Not Proved Under Section 13(1)(iii) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The case involves two appeals filed by the husband, Gajendra Mohite, against a common judgment of the Family Court at Aurangabad. The marriage between...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Married Sister-in-Law and Husband in Dowry Harassment Case Under Section 498A IPC. Routine Inclusion of All Relatives Without Specific Allegations Amounts to Abuse of Process, Court Invokes Inherent Powers Under Section 482 CrPC.

The case involved a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by five applicants seeking quashing of FIR C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal from Husband Against Dismissal of Divorce Petition Based on Cruelty and Adultery — Wife Denies Adultery and Alleges Husband's Infidelity

The appeal arises from the dismissal of a divorce petition by the Family Court, Aurangabad. The appellant-husband, a professor, married respondent-wif...