Search Results for "technical plea"

1615 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1615 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Anticipatory Bail in Building Collapse; Alleged Negligent Chipping of Columns Not Causa Causans According to Applicant. Licensee Seeks Pre-Arrest Bail, Contending No Gross Negligence and Exoneration by Municipal Committee Reports.

The matter involved an anticipatory bail application filed by Sundeep Bafna before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant had taken the underground a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of PIL and Writ Petition Challenging FSI Increase in Mumbai Suburbs under MRTP Act. Petitioners Contended Notifications Violated Article 14 and 21 and Amounted to Major Modification Not Permissible under Section 37 of MRTP Act.

This incomplete judgment text of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, concerns two petitions: Public Interest...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Validity of Prosecution Sanctions: Pre-Trial Determination or Trial Issue? A comprehensive analysis of conflicting Apex Court judgments on the timing and significance of challenging prosecution sanctions under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The legal debate on whether the validity of a prosecution sanction must be determined before trial or can be contested during the trial. It examines k...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Refusal to Condon 12-Year Delay in Restoration Application. Limitation Rules Apply Equally to Government; No Sufficient Cause Shown for Inordinate Delay.

The dispute originated from a lease deed executed in 1951 for a bungalow in Pune Cantonment. The respondent (landlord) filed a civil suit in 1981 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking MEIS Benefits Despite Inadvertent Error in Shipping Bills. Court Directs Acceptance of Amended Shipping Bills and Grant of MEIS Scrips, Holding That Systemic Limitations Cannot Deny Legitimate Claims Under Section 149 of Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, filed a writ petition seeking directions to the respondents to accept amendments made in three shipping bills...