Search Results for "statutory sanction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "statutory sanction"

2508 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2508 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Filing of Revised Income Tax Returns After Due Date in Amalgamation Case — Holds That NCLT-Approved Scheme Overrides Procedural Timelines Under Income Tax Act. Clause 64(c) of the Scheme Permitting Revised Returns Has Statutory Force and Department Cannot Reject Them as Invalid.

18 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by M/s Dalmia Power Limited and M/s Dalmia Cement (Bharat) Limited against the judgment of the Division Be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

23 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up of S. Kumars Nationwide Ltd. for Inability to Pay Debts. Multiple financial creditors and operational creditors successfully proved the company's insolvency under Sections 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

1 Jul 2016

The judgment concerns a batch of company petitions filed by various financial creditors and operational creditors seeking the winding up of S. Kumars ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition by State of Maharashtra Against Consent Order in Writ Petition — Concession by Government Advocate Binding on State. The court held that the State cannot resile from a concession made by its advocate, as it would be an abuse of process.

13 Jul 2026

The judgment pertains to a Review Petition filed by the State of Maharashtra seeking review of an order dated 13/12/2019, which disposed of Writ Petit...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Issues Rule in PIL Challenging Encroachment and Regularisation of Comunidade Lands; Petitioners Allege Violation of Code of Comunidades and Favouritism to Minister.

6 May 2016

Two Public Interest Litigation writ petitions (PIL WP No. 15 of 2014 and PIL WP No. 16 of 2014) were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa chal...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Issues Rule and Hears PIL Concerning Alleged Illegal Encroachment on Comunidade Land in Serula. Petitioners Claimed Violation of Code of Comunidades and Sought Quashing of Regularization Orders.

6 May 2016

The matter involved two Public Interest Litigation writ petitions filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, alleging large‑scale illegal encroac...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Consent Terms Binding on Successor Developer. Petitioners' Entitlement to Two Shops of 409 Sq Ft Each Upheld Based on Consent Terms in Suit No.1994 of 2008.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Alphonso D'Souza and Vanessa D'Souza, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 5th January 2022 passed by the Apex Grievances...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules Valid Despite Absence of Specific Enabling Provision in Parent Act at Time of Introduction. Input Tax Credit is a Facility, Not a Vested Right; State Can Restrict ITC on Stock-in-Trade to Reduced Tax Rate.

4 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the State of Punjab against a High Court judgment that had struck down Rule 21(8) of the Punjab Value Added Ta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the orders were invalid as they undermined the independence of the CBI Director.

8 Jan 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23rd October 2018. The first order was passed by the Centra...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)