Search Results for "revisional orders"

1726 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1726 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Section 411 IPC Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge of Stolen Property. Conviction for Dishonest Receipt of Stolen Property Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Mens Rea Under Section 411 IPC.

The applicant, Rajesh Ganeshmal Oswal, was accused no.4 in Regular Criminal Case No.110 of 2008 before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Railway C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Law Revision Case — No Second Revision Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. Revisional Authority Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Second Revision Against Order of Divisional Joint Registrar.

The present petition raised an issue whether under the provisions of Section 154 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, a power can be ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hit-and-Run Case Due to Lack of Evidence Identifying Driver. Conviction under Sections 279, 304A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act Quashed as Prosecution Failed to Prove Applicant Was Driving the Offending Tempo.

The applicant, Ramnath Yashwant Gholap, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Ashti, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Petition Challenging Maintenance Award to Wife Under Section 125 CrPC. Wife's Earning Capacity Does Not Bar Maintenance If She Is Unable to Maintain Herself.

The petitioner, Harischandra Bhanudas Lande, filed a writ petition challenging the orders of the Judicial Magistrate, Shevgaon, and the Revisional Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Quashing of Process in Defamation Case — Complaint Lacked Averment of Publication to Third Party. The Court held that publication is a sine qua non for defamation under Sections 500 and 501 IPC, and the Sessions Court rightly set aside the process.

The petitioner, Satyabhash Yeshwant Salgaonkar, was the original complainant who filed a complaint alleging offences punishable under Sections 500 (de...