Search Results for "review petition"

6250 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6250 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Letters Patent Appeal by MSRTC Driver, Restores 50% Back Wages. Industrial Court Found to Have Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, by Interfering with Labour Court's Discretionary Award.

The appellant, a former driver with the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), was dismissed from service on 28.09.1991 on grounds of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition No. 3410 of 2004

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, heard two writ petitions together. The petitioners, former Branch Manager and Accountant of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Medical Unfitness Declaration for Driver Post Due to Presternal Keloid Chest. Court holds that keloid is not a disqualifying condition for driving and directs BRO to reconsider petitioner's candidature.

The petitioner, Sayyad Naim Ali Kachruddin, applied for the post of Driver Mechanical Transport (Ordinary Grade) with the Border Roads Organisation (B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Petitioner Challenging Tender Rejection by KPTCL - No Violation of Natural Justice Found in Battery Energy Storage System Tender Process

The petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the rejection of its bid in a tender process...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract by MMRDA. Contractual Dispute with Arbitration Clause Not Amenable to Judicial Review Under Article 226 as Termination Was in Accordance with Contract Terms.

The petitioner, Systra MVA Consulting (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company with 70% stake in Systra-SMCIPL Consortium, was appointed as General Consultant by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...