Search Results for "possession delay"

3731 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3731 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Regular Second Appeal and Connected Writ Petitions Concerning Land Regularization and Possession Dispute in Sy.No.148. The Court Examined the History of Revenue Entries, Grants, and Cancellation of Durasth Between the Parties.

The dispute concerned agricultural land bearing Sy. No. 148 of Kannamangala Village, Kasaba Hobli, Channapatna Taluk. The legal battle involved two fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award on Termination and Repudiation of Master Asset Purchase Agreement. Arbitrator's Finding of Repudiation by Purchaser and Direction for Refund of Consideration under MAPA Considered.

The dispute arose from a Master Asset Purchase Agreement (MAPA) dated 31st March 2005 between Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt. Ltd. as purchaser and V Hote...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit — Remand Order Set Aside Due to Lack of Jurisdiction. First Appellate Court Exceeded Its Powers Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC by Remanding Suit Without Satisfying Conditions for Remand.

The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership, possession, and permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Application in Development Agreement Dispute — Prima Facie Case Not Made Out as Agreement Was Terminated for Non-Performance. Specific Performance Claim Requires Trial; No Irreparable Loss Shown.

The Plaintiffs, Shantilal J. Shah and others, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a Development Agreement dated 25th September 2007 and an Irrevoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...