Search Results for "notice under CPC"

3601 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3601 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Frames Charges Against Accused for Filing Frivolous Litigations; Supreme Court Dispenses with Trial in Contempt Case. Forum Shopping and Abuse of Process Held to Amount to Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The criminal contempt petition was filed by Hasham Investment and Trading Company Private Limited, Wipro Limited, and Azim Hasham Premji (complainants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Land Owners’ Appeal, Remands Land Acquisition Reference for Fresh Consideration. Settlement Validity Must Be Examined Under KUDA Act and CPC, Prior Government Approval Necessary for Consent Award.

The appellants were owners of lands bearing Survey Nos.304/2A and 304/2B, measuring 11 acres 24 guntas, situated at Mahalbagayat, Vijayapura. The land...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Concerning Forfeiture of Bid Securities in Tender Process. The Petition Questions Whether the Arbitrator Correctly Interpreted Clause 19.6 of the Tender Instructions and the Law on Bank Guarantees.

The dispute arose out of a tender process floated by the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited for supply, construction, and comm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Consolidation of Cooperative Disputes for Joint Trial — Revision Order Upheld. Common questions of law and fact justified consolidation under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Tarkude Hotels Pvt. Ltd., filed a dispute (No.254/2006) before the Cooperative Court, Pune, against The Rupee Cooperative Bank Ltd. an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Service of Statutory Notice Valid Despite Unsigned Office Copy. Absence of Signature on Office Copy of Demand Notice Does Not Invalidate Service Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Vardhman Steel, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Sai Engineering, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...