Search Results for "layout development"

1134 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1134 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Hawking Activities on Footpaths in Nariman Point and Churchgate Areas. Court Holds That Hawking Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 19(1)(g) Subject to Reasonable Restrictions, and That Municipal Authorities Have Discretion to Designate Hawking Zones.

The petitioners, a group of residents and welfare associations from Nariman Point and Churchgate areas in Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.

This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.

The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.

The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Against National Sports Club of India Construction, Upholding Environmental and Municipal Permissions. Court finds no violation of CRZ or heritage regulations and rejects allegations of illegal construction as motivated by private interests.

The petitioner, Society for Promotion of Equality, Awareness and Rights (SPEAR), filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging SEIAA's Deferral of Environmental Clearance Based on NGT Judgment. SEIAA Must Independently Apply Mind to Each Proposal and Cannot Mechanically Defer Decisions Due to NGT's Order on Recreational Ground.

The Petitioner No.1, NAREDCO West Foundation, is the Maharashtra chapter of the National Real Estate Development Council, representing over 400 real e...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of RERA Rules Requiring Registration of Ongoing Projects Without Prior Approvals. Rule 18(8) and Rule 31(9) of Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules 2017 held intra vires the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

The case involves three writ appeals filed by real estate developers (M/s. Panchmal Properties, M/s. Sri Nandana Builders, and another) against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Unauthorized Construction and Inaction by Municipal Corporation — Directions Issued to MCGM to Act Within Four Weeks. Resident's Locus Standi Upheld Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Sections 351, 354, 355A, 488.

The petitioner, Dr. Rahul Jain, a resident of Borivali West, Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...