Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2405 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2405 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Writ Petition for Refund of PPF Amount with Interest — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Matured PPF Amount with Interest at PPF Rate from Date of Maturity till Payment. The court directed the respondents to pay the matured PPF amount with interest at the PPF rate from the date of maturity till actual payment within four weeks.

23 Sep 2016

The petitioner, Ambadas s/o Tolaji Suradkar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad seeking refund of his matured Public ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds trial and first appellate court decrees regarding declaration of title and permanent injunction, finding no substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

10 Jul 2026

The case pertains to a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of the firs...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Includability of Bought-Out Items in Assessable Value of CKD Boilers. Appeal Under Section 35L(1)(b) of Central Excise Act, 1944 Challenges CESTAT Order Holding That Essential Parts Delivered at Site Must Be Included in Transaction Value for Duty Assessment.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard statutory appeals under Section 35L(1)(b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the common final order of the Customs, Excis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeals in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Housing Project. Developer's liability to refund allottees upheld due to breach of construction timeline under Tripartite Agreement, with consumer fora jurisdiction affirmed despite arbitration clause.

13 Apr 2023

The dispute arose from a housing project named 'Pride Asia' in Chandigarh, where the Chandigarh Housing Board (CHB) was appointed as the nodal agency ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes CGRF Clarification Order for Lack of Jurisdiction — Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum Cannot Review or Clarify Its Own Orders Under Electricity Act, 2003. CGRF's Order Directing MSEDCL to Refund Excess FAC Installments Set Aside as Without Authority of Law.

20 Jan 2023

The Bombay High Court considered a writ petition filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) challenging an order dated ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Condition for Privilege Fees on Tie-Up Agreement for Manufacture of Indian Made Foreign Liquor. Condition No.5 requiring payment of privilege fees on account of a tie-up agreement for manufacture of Indian Made Foreign Liquor was held to be without authority of law and ultra vires the Maharashtra Distillation of Spirits and Manufacture of Potable Liquor Rules, 1966.

16 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Ramon Distilleries Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing Indian Made Foreign Liquor (I...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Cess/Additional Stamp Duty Paid Under Protest — Levy of 10% Cess on Maximum Stamp Duty Held Unauthorized Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 and Karnataka Cess on Stamp Duty Act, 1962. Division Bench directs refund of ₹2.5 crores with interest at 6% per annum from date of payment.

6 Aug 2025

The appellant, Prestige Exora Business Parks Limited, filed an intra-court appeal against an order dated 27.01.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Setting Aside Compensation Levy in Construction Contract Dispute. Levy of Compensation Under Clause 2 of GCC Invalid for Non-Compliance with Contractual Mechanism of Show Cause Notice and Quantification.

12 Mar 2019

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising from a construction contract between the General Manager, Heavy Water Plant (Manuguru) (petiti...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Proved Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance as he had deposited balance consideration and issued notice, satisfying Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

6 Apr 2022

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12.09.2007 and 20.09.2007 for suit schedule property. The ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Bills Based on Unverified Meter Readings. Dispute pertains to demand for arrears under Section 56 of the Electricity Act, 2003, where the licensee failed to provide inspection report or verify meter readings.

2 Feb 2016

The petitioner, M/s Channagiri Cements Pvt. Ltd., a cement manufacturing company, filed two writ petitions challenging the demand for arrears of elect...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)