KAHC010000842011_1
11 Jul 2014The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...
Search Results for "compensation rehabilitation"
973 result(s) found
Found 973 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses NOIDA's Appeals Against Quashing of Land Acquisition Notifications and Compensation Direction. Acquisition Notifications Quashed Due to Illegal Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Section 17 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
5 Mar 2019The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) against the Allahabad High Court's judgment quashing land ac...
- 221
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Declaring Lapse of Reservation for Garden Under MRTP Act, 1966 Due to Failure to Acquire Within One Year of Notice. Reservation Lapses Absolutely as No Declaration Under Section 126 Was Published Despite Proposal to Collector.
2 Aug 2018The petitioners, owners of two parcels of land in Borivali, Mumbai, filed writ petitions seeking a declaration that the reservation of their lands for...
- 22
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Government of NCT of Delhi in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Overturns High Court's Declaration of Deemed Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Possession Taken in 1986 and Compensation Not Paid Does Not Result in Lapse as per Indore Development Authority Constitution Bench Decision.
15 Dec 2022The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that the ...
- 156
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal Against Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act. Possession Taken and Compensation Deposited Preclude Deemed Lapse.
2 Dec 2022The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and another against the judgment of the Delhi High Court. The High Court ...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Reference Barred by Limitation and Compensation Excessive. Reference Court's enhancement of compensation from Rs.40,500 to Rs.1,00,000 per hectare set aside as unsupported by evidence and reference held time-barred under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
7 Mar 2012The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the reference Court dated 23/6/1994, which enhanced compensation for land acquired for rehab...
- 160
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Claimant's Appeal for Enhanced Compensation and Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Determined at Rs. 100 per sq.ft Based on Comparable Sale Instances.
23 Dec 2014The case involves two appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The land, measuring 1.21 HR (1,29,345 sq.ft) out of Survey No. 118/3 at Digras, ...
- 141
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Case Under National Highways Act, 1956. The court upheld landowners' entitlement to solatium and interest, rejecting arguments based on corrected financial burden estimates as insufficient grounds for review.
25 Mar 2026The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a Review Petition filed by the Appellants seeking recall of its earlier order in Tarsem Singh-II, which had dis...
- 1168
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions and Review Petitions in Land Acquisition Matter — Finds No Error in Order Declaring Lapse. Acquisition of Lands Deemed Lapsed Under Section 27 of BDA Act and Section 24(2) of 2013 Act as Neither Award Nor Compensation Was Made Within Prescribed Period, Despite Society's and BDA's Contentions.
1 Mar 2019The case involved a cluster of writ petitions and review petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging an order dated 15.07.2...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Section 37 Appeals, Directs Inclusion of Solatium in National Highways Acquisition Awards. Omission of 30% Solatium Held to be a Computational Error Rectifiable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
27 Apr 2026Background: The matters involved a batch of appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging arbitral awards that d...
- 15
