COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 371 OF 2019
11 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "commercial execution petition"
1732 result(s) found
Found 1732 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to Clarification Order and Section 60(8) of KVAT Act — Upholds Tax Rate of 14.5% on Diapers, Under-pads, and Sanitary Napkins. Commissioner's Clarification Overruling Advance Ruling Authority Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 60(8) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
23 Oct 2017The petitioner, M/s Bella Premier Happy Hygiene Care Private Limited, a manufacturer of 'All-in-one Diapers, Under-pads and Sanitary Napkins', challen...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to MMRDA's Additional Premium Demand — Interpretation of Articles 2(c), 2(d), 2(e) of Lease Deed and Impact of Supplementary Lease Deed. The Court Examines Whether Delay in Construction Attributable to MMRDA's Approvals and Absence of Time Limit for Additional Built-Up Area Renders Demand Arbitrary.
8 Apr 2026The dispute arose from a demand notice issued by the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) to the Indian Newspaper Society (the pet...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Pledge and Corporate Guarantee — Holds That Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favored Appellant for Injunction Against Enforcement of Personal Guarantees and Share Pledge Pending Arbitration.
2 May 2023The appellant, Palmview Investments Overseas Limited, a company incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, filed an appeal against an order of the Co...
- 25
High Court
Madras High Court Grants Bail to Six Accused in NDPS Cases Citing Right to Speedy Trial and Delay in Trial. Section 37 of NDPS Act Not an Absolute Bar When Trial Is Delayed, and Parity With Co-Accused Justifies Bail.
17 Mar 2026The judgment involves six criminal original petitions filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), seeking bail in ...
- 77
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Airport Authority in Tender Dispute, Reinstating Eligibility Criteria for Ground Handling Services. The Court Held That Tender Conditions Fall Within Commercial Wisdom of Authority and Are Not Arbitrary, and an NGO Lacks Locus Standi to Challenge Them Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
30 Sep 2022The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the Centre for Aviation Policy, Safety & Research (CAPSR) challenging the eligibility criteria in Requ...
- 407
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Shareholders for Alleged Scandalous Allegations in Legal Proceedings. Filing of false cases does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes the court or impedes administration of justice under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
31 Jan 2019The petitioner, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC), filed a contempt petition against respondent shareholders Sureshchandra V. Par...
- 130
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Enemy Property Tax Exemption Case — Property Tax Levyable on Lessee Despite Union Ownership. Article 285(2) of Constitution Enables Municipal Corporation to Impose Property Tax on Lessee of Union Property Even if Union Itself is Exempt Under Article 285(1).
22 Feb 2024The present civil appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondent-assessee, holding th...
- 188
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Cancelled Development Agreement — Agreement Cancelled Prior to Adjudication Not Liable to Stamp Duty Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. The court held that stamp duty is chargeable on instruments, not on transactions, and a cancelled instrument cannot be subjected to duty.
5 Mar 2020The petitioner, Vikrant Vikas Raikar, proprietor of M/s. Elegant Constructions, challenged an order dated 16th March 2018 passed by the Chief Controll...
- 69
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.
29 Nov 2021The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...
- 442
