Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Limitation Act, 1908"

1872 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1872 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Appeals by Acquiring Authority in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. The Court examines the correctness of enhanced compensation awarded under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for land acquired under the MRTP Act.

13 Feb 2018

The appeals before the Bombay High Court arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with the Maharashtra Region...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

14 Mar 2024

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Court dismissing their...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Limitation Is a Triable Issue. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, only plaint averments are relevant and if they disclose a cause of action, the plaint cannot be rejected; limitation is a mixed question of law and fact.

30 Nov -0001

The applicant, Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, who was original defendant No.9 in the suit, filed a Notice of Motion seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Ru...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order in Execution Proceedings; Permits Power of Attorney Holder to Argue. Execution of Decree for Possession in Specific Performance Suit Involves Third Party Rights.

7 Oct 2005

This appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent read with Order XXI Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenged the order of a learned...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Director of Education's Order to Reinstate Head Master — Termination by Administrator Appointed Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976 Upheld as Valid. The court held that an appeal under Section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 is not maintainable against an order of termination passed by an Administrator appointed under the Management Act, as the Administrator is a statutory authority and not the 'management'.

22 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Madhukar Bijaramji Sawarkar, as Secretary and Chief Executive Officer of Pipla Education Society, challenged the order dated 23.4.1990...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Co-owner's Possession. Court holds that possession of one co-owner is possession of all co-owners unless there is ouster, and that the trial court and first appellate court erred in not considering this principle under the Limitation Act, 1963.

30 Nov -0001

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession and declaration of title filed by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Recovery of Business Premises — Conducting Agreement Not Proved as License; Relationship of Licensor-Licensee Not Established. The court held that the plaintiff failed to prove the conducting agreement and the defendant's possession was adverse, barring the suit by limitation.

19 May 2020

The appellants (original defendants) challenged the judgment and decree dated 20th March 2007 passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, which decreed the...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Service Matter — Limitation Bar for Recovery of Salary Arrears. Suit for recovery of salary arrears filed after 20 years held barred by limitation under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.

24 Feb 2022

The appellant, Smt. Rabiya Abdul Hamid Bepari, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Pro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Holds Trial Court Can Frame Preliminary Issue Under Section 9-A CPC Disposing of Suit in Part. The Court interprets Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Maharashtra Amendment) to allow partial disposal of suit or cause of action on preliminary issue of jurisdiction.

18 Jul 2024

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to answer a reference on whether a trial court, under Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Against State Consumer Commission Order in Dispute Over Electricity Tariff Reclassification. Petitioners, an electricity supply company, challenged the State Commission's order, but respondents argued that the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 provides an alternative remedy of appeal to the National Commission, raising the issue of whether the High Court should entertain the writ petition.

17 Oct 2022

The Mangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd. (petitioners) filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging the order...

52 53 54 55 56

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)