Search Results for "IPC 506"

1911 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1911 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Husband in Dowry Harassment Case — Petitioner Granted Pre-Arrest Bail Subject to Conditions. Court Held That Custodial Interrogation May Not Be Necessary for Investigation Under Sections 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner, Avinash Rajanna, filed a criminal petition under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking anticipatory bail ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Delay in FIR and Consent Allegations. Court Held That Victim's Age (19 Years) and Delay in Filing Complaint Weakened Prosecution Case Under Sections 363, 307, 376, 506 IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act.

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking regular bail in Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Public Servants for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 Cr.P.C. — Allegations of Trespass and Assault Found to Be in Discharge of Official Duty.

The present criminal petition was filed by Shantinath and Kuntinath (petitioners/accused) under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Material to Support Apprehension of Bail. Detenu in Judicial Custody Without Bail Application; Detaining Authority's Satisfaction of Imminent Release Held Unsubstantiated.

The petitioner, Sagar Sunil Gaikwad, challenged an order of detention dated 27 September 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — Trial Court Directed to Record Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 200 CrPC Before Framing Charges. The Court held that in a private complaint, the Magistrate must record evidence before charge, following Rajanna v. Chayapathi.

The revision petitioner, accused in a private complaint case filed by the respondent/complainant under Sections 406, 420, 504, and 506 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — Trial Court Directed to Record Pre-Charge Evidence. Failure to Record Evidence Before Charge in a Private Complaint Case Violates Section 200 CrPC and Mandates Remand.

The case arises from a private complaint filed by the respondent/complainant against the revision petitioner/accused for offences punishable under Sec...