Search Results for "Delay Condone"

1009 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1009 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Favour of Claimant. Court Holds That Single Judge Erred in Reappreciating Evidence and Interfering with Arbitrator's Findings on Quantum and Interest.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Paramount Limited (appellant) against the judgmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Cancellation of Flat Allotment for Non-Payment Due to Non-Issuance of Demand Letter. Petitioner's Allotment Cannot Be Cancelled Without Issuance of Formal Demand Letter Under Regulation 18(1) of MHADA (Disposal of Land) Regulations, 1992.

The petitioner, Sandeep Uttam Bodke, applied for allotment of a flat under the Lower Income Group (LIG) category in response to an advertisement issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Redevelopment NOC and IOD for Lack of Locus Standi and Delay. Petitioner, an occupant of an adjoining building, failed to establish any legal right or interest in the redeveloped property and challenged the permissions after a significant delay.

The Petitioner, Ikram Suleman Qureshi, an occupant of a residential flat in Suleman Tower, an adjoining building, filed a Writ Petition challenging a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Share Transfer Dispute. Court upholds CLB's refusal to condone delay in filing application for rectification of register of members under Section 155 of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dismissing an application for condonation of delay in filing a petition under Section 15...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Arbitration Appeal Due to Availability of Alternate Remedy Under Section 115 CPC. Petitioner failed to avail revision remedy before challenging order under Article 227 of Constitution.

The petitioner, Jayantrao Dhanwatey, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 21/12/2013 passed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...