WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...
Search Results for "Collector permission"
1787 result(s) found
Found 1787 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Disqualification of Municipal Councillor for Spouse's Unauthorized Construction Under Section 44(1)(e) of Maharashtra Municipal Council Act. The court held that the provision imposes strict liability on the Councillor for constructions by her spouse, without requiring her knowledge or involvement.
22 Apr 2019The appellant, Sampada Yogesh Waghdhare, was elected as a Municipal Councillor and later as President of the Council on 11.02.2015. The second respond...
- 424
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.
8 Mar 2024The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act – Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years. Reservation of land for public purpose lapses as acquiring body failed to take steps within prescribed period under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
29 Nov 2017The petitioners, co-owners of ancestral land in Chehedi village within Nashik Municipal Corporation limits, filed a writ petition seeking a declaratio...
- 203
High Court
High Court Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging Closure of Pathway and Old Bridge by Power Company; Issue of Whether Spillway is Public Road and Whether Closure is Unauthorised Considered
10 Aug 2006The dispute arose from a public interest litigation filed by a retired municipal engineer and resident of Lonavala, challenging the closure of a pathw...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition by MSEDCL Without Due Process — Acquisition of Land for Electricity Sub-Station Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that the acquisition of land by MSEB without following the procedure under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, is illegal and directed restoration of possession or payment of compensation.
5 Jan 2024The petitioners, owners of land admeasuring 6685 sq.mtrs at Village Panchpakhadi, Thane, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra S...
- 142
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for Power Project Under MID Act and Rehabilitation Act — Acquisition Held Valid for Public Purpose of Augmenting Power Supply. The court upheld the notifications under Sections 32 and 33 of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 and Sections 11, 13, 14 of the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1986 for acquisition of agricultural land for a 1600 MW coastal power plant.
4 Apr 2012The petitioners, residents of Taluka Alibag, District Raigad, challenged the acquisition of their agricultural lands for a 1600 MW Coastal Power Plant...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Validity of Rule 5 of Goa Minor Mineral Concession (Amendment) Rules, 2002 — Declares Quarry Lease Valid Despite Deletion of Chapter III. Rule 5, which deleted Chapter III of the Goa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1985, is held intra vires Section 15 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, as the State Government has power to make rules for grant of quarry leases in respect of land belonging to private persons.
10 Dec 2013The petitioner, Smt. Maria Teresa Philomena D'Rocha Pegado, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the constitutional v...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners' Challenge to Collector's Stay Order on Shifting of Liquor Business — Stay Order Passed Without Hearing Licensee Set Aside. The Court held that once permission is granted and fees collected, the Collector cannot unilaterally stay the shifting without affording an opportunity of hearing.
29 Apr 2015The petitioners, partners of M/s Anjali Wines, held a licence (FL-II/CL/FL/TOD-3) to run a liquor business at Nagar road, Beed. They were occupying pr...
- 183
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Sand Ghat Allotments in Re-auction Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. The court held that cancellation of allotment without notice and hearing is arbitrary and unsustainable under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
31 Mar 2016The petitioners, five proprietors of firms, were allotted sand ghats through an auction process. However, the respondents issued a re-auction notice o...
- 136
