Search Results for "prospective service"

1083 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1083 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Computation Dispute Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Labour Court's Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction to Determine Entitlement to Higher Gratuity Rate.

The case involves a dispute over gratuity computation between Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceuticals Corporation Ltd. (the petitioner) and its retired employee,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Scrutinizes Validity of Auction Sale in Execution Proceedings Due to Notice Irregularities. Compliance with Order XXI Rule 66(2) CPC and Affixing of Proclamation on Court-House Examined in Appeal Against Confirmation of Sale.

The appeal arose from an order of the City Civil Court dismissing a notice of motion seeking to set aside an ex parte decree and the subsequent auctio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Retrospective Service Tax Amendment on Renting of Immovable Property. The Court upheld the explanation to Section 65(105)(zzc) of the Finance Act, 1994 as clarificatory and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Chanakya Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...