Search Results for "notice under section 138"

1863 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1863 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal and Convicts Accused Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Court Holds That Stop Payment Instruction Does Not Absolve Drawer of Liability When Cheque Was Issued for Discharge of Legally Enforceable Debt.

The appellant, Kamal Babulal Sharma, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order dated 08/06/2001 passed by the 9th Judicial Magistrate, Fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Recalls Earlier Conviction Order and Re-Hears Appeal on Maintainability of Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. in Cheque Dishonour Case. Court Addresses Whether Second Appeal Lies Against Acquittal by First Appellate Court Under Negotiable Instruments Act.

This criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 arose from a cheque dishonour complaint under Section 138 of the Neg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Bombay High Court Order Setting Aside Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A NI Act. Signatory of Cheque Authorized by Company is 'Drawer' Liable for Interim Compensation Under Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant company entered into agreements with Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd. (Cane) and made advance payments of Rs.63,46,00,000/- for supply of s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Section 138 NI Act Proceedings Against Accused Due to Non-Existent Debt and Unrebutted Defence. Dishonour of Cheque Issued as Security for Loan Not Attracting Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as Debt Not Legally Enforceable.

The petitioner, Sri Lalji Kesha Vaid, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking quashing of crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Director in Minimum Wages Act Case Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Complaint Failed to Establish Director Was In-Charge of Company's Business Under Section 22C of Minimum Wages Act, 1948, Making Prosecution Unmaintainable.

The dispute arose from a criminal complaint filed against Dayle De'Souza, a director of Writer Safeguard Pvt. Ltd., alleging violations of the Minimum...