Search Results for "interregnum period"

730 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 730 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Tenders for Take Home Ration and Hot Cooked Meal Programs. Court finds no violation of Supreme Court directions as impugned tenders were not issued by State Government but by Municipal Corporation.

The petitioner, Mumbai V. Konkan Vibhagiya Mahila Aydyogik Utpadak Sahakari Sanstha Mahasangh Ltd., a federation of women self-help groups registered ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry Soon Before Death. Conviction under Section 304B IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Proximate Link Between Demand and Death.

The appellant, Santosh Bhaskar Derle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Niphad, for offences under Sections 304B, 498A, and 323 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Canceling Cinema License for Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Speaking Order. Appellate Authority Under Section 8A of Bombay Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1953 Cannot Cancel License Without Recording Findings on Grounds Under Section 6.

The petitioners, Deepak Joshi and the legal representatives of Ravi K. Appu, challenged an order dated 28.01.1999 passed by the State Minister (Home),...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal to Frame Preliminary Issue in Rent Act Proceedings. Maintainability of Application Under Section 13A(2) of Bombay Rents Act Involves Mixed Questions of Law and Fact and Cannot Be Decided as Preliminary Issue.

The case involves two writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 7th October 2004 passed by the competent authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Clarifies Magistrate's Power to Grant Bail in Sessions Triable Cases Under Section 437 CrPC. The court held that a Judicial Magistrate can grant bail in offences exclusively triable by the Sessions Court, subject to the limitations under the proviso to Section 437(1) CrPC.

The petitioner, Sanjay Narhar Malshe, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an FIR registered against him. However, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Amendment in Commercial IP Suit Due to Delay and Lack of Due Diligence. Amendment After Commencement of Trial Not Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Plaintiffs Failed to Show They Could Not Have Raised the Matter Earlier.

The present Interim Application No. 752 of 2024 was filed by the original plaintiffs, Ramnish Verma and Finesse Fashions Pvt. Ltd., in a pending Comme...