Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "carry forward and set off"

596 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Commercial Suit for Specific Performance — Defendant's Right to Challenge Maintainability Preserved. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events and alternative relief under Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, held permissible without prejudice to defendant's objections.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiffs, Shashisumeet Production Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a Commercial Suit No. 621 of 2017 seeking specific performance of an agreement for...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Arbitrary Cut-Off Marks in Screening Test for Junior Scale Officer Recruitment. Rule 10 of Goa Civil Service Rules, 2016 Requires Objective Criteria; Commission's Discretion Must Be Exercised Reasonably.

21 Nov 2017

The petitioners, who applied for the post of Junior Scale Officer in the Goa Civil Services, challenged the action of the Goa Public Service Commissio...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows PIL Challenging Illegal Construction in CRZ Area - Violation of Coastal Regulation Zone Notification and Environmental Laws. Construction of jetty and retaining wall in CRZ-I area without prior approval from MoEF and GCZMA held illegal and directed to be demolished.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations filed before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the construction of a jetty and other s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act and Section 376(2)(i) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child below 18 years.

5 Jul 2022

The appellant, Mahesh S/o Kundlik Dhavare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.26 of 2015 for offences under Sect...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Money Decree in Summary Suit for Dishonour of Cheque — Held That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Debt and That Cheque Was Not Issued for Discharge of Existing Liability. The Court set aside the decree as the suit was based on a time-barred debt and the plaintiff failed to establish consideration.

27 Oct 2016

The present appeal arises from a money decree passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai in Summary Suit No.6980 of 2004. The appellants, who were the ori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Life Convict Seeking Premature Release — State's Order Requiring 26 Years Imprisonment Set Aside. Court holds that Government Resolution dated 15th March 2010 requires specific finding of exceptional violence to deny premature release after 14 years.

28 Nov 2013

The petitioner, Santosh @ Sonu Balram Jadhav, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment on 21st July...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

21 Apr 2022

The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...

High Court

High Court Allows Amalgamated Company's Claim for Unabsorbed Depreciation of Sick Company Under Section 32(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that unabsorbed depreciation of amalgamating company is deemed to be depreciation of amalgamated company under Section 32(6) and can be carried forward irrespective of whether amalgamating company filed returns.

7 Sep 2017

The case involves two income tax appeals filed by M/s. Ballarpur Industries Ltd. (BILT) against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Vidarbha, Nagpur, conc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Boundary Correction in Execution Proceedings. Executing Court Cannot Modify Decree by Altering Property Description Beyond Decree's Terms Under Section 47 of CPC.

10 May 2013

The Petitioner, The Ratnakar Bank Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12/04/2012 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Allowing Settlement Application. Settlement Commission's prima facie satisfaction under Section 245D(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding true and full disclosure cannot be challenged by Revenue at the stage of allowing the application.

4 Apr 2019

The Income Tax Department filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 30.5.2017 passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission under Section 245D...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)