Search Results for "Taking Over Certificate"

4754 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4754 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Case Due to Binding Consent Decrees — Competent Authority Cannot Override Civil Court Decrees. Consent Decree Operates as Res Judicata and Estoppel Between Parties Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, owner of a larger property, had constructed a building and sold flats to purchasers who formed Respondent No. 2 Society. The Petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Possession Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy Before DRT Must Be Exhausted. Writ Petition Not Maintainable as SARFAESI Act Provides Complete Mechanism for Aggrieved Persons Under Section 17.

The petitioners, Dr. Anil Nandkishor Tibrewala and his wife, owned a flat in Mumbai. They had mortgaged the flat to Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee Orders Due to Arbitrary Rejection of Old Documentary Evidence. Court Emphasizes Probative Value of 1938 and 1950 Documents and Directs Fresh Consideration as Committee Acted on Surmises Without Expert Opinion.

The dispute involved multiple writ petitions filed by members of the Togarwar family challenging orders of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant in Wildlife Declaration Case Due to Time-Barred Application. Time Limit Under Rule 4(2) of Declaration of Wild Life Stock Rules, 2003 is Mandatory and Cannot Be Relaxed, as Per Section 40A of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The appeal arose from a dispute concerning the time limit for filing declarations under wildlife protection laws. The appellant, in possession of a de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307, 147, 148 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of five appellants by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad at Alibaug for offences punishable unde...