High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Rule 147 proviso"
626 result(s) found
Found 626 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.
6 Feb 2020The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...
- 60
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Prove Self-Acquired Property. Joint Family Property Presumed Where Common Funds Used and Possession Shared.
27 Nov 2014The case involves a partition suit filed by the respondents (plaintiffs) against the appellant (defendant) seeking partition and separate possession o...
- 46
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Excise License Fee Hike — License Fee Enhancement for CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 Licenses Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 17 of Karnataka Excise Act, 1965. Court Held That the Fee Is a Privilege Fee and Not a Tax, and the Government's Policy Decision Is Not Arbitrary.
24 Jun 2014The petitioners, who are holders of CL-2, CL-7, and CL-9 excise licenses for retail sale of liquor and bars/restaurants in Hubli and Gadag districts, ...
- 64
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Satisfaction Note Recorded Beyond Three-Year Limit Invalid. Reassessment Notice Quashed as Satisfaction Note Was Recorded After Expiry of Three Years from End of Relevant Assessment Year, Violating Section 149(1)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.
30 Mar 2026The petitioner, Aditya H. Patel, a salaried individual, filed his return of income for Assessment Year 2019-20 on 02.09.2019, declaring a total income...
- 113
High Court
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Discretion of Parsi Matrimonial Courts to Appoint Court Commissioner for Evidence Recording Under PMDA. The court held that the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 does not expressly or impliedly bar the application of Order XVIII Rule 4 CPC for recording evidence before a Commissioner.
21 Nov 2024The case arose from an appeal against an order dated 3 April 2014 passed by the learned Parsi Chief Metropolitan Court, Mumbai (Justice G S Patel) in ...
- 377
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Public Interest Litigation on Unregulated Stem Cell Therapies for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Court Examines Legality Under Drugs Act and Lays Down Permissibility of Such Therapies in Clinical Trial Settings Only.
1 Jan 1970This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Yash Charitable Trust and others before the Supreme Court, raising concerns about the rampant promotion a...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Income Tax Act — Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit and Without Proper Sanction Is Invalid. Reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 quashed as time-barred and sanction under Section 151 not by competent authority.
28 Mar 2024The petitioner, a foreign company, challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2016-...
- 60
High Court
- 48
