Search Results for "Registered User Agreement"

578 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 578 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Condominium Association for Lack of Locus Standi Under Consumer Protection Act. Statutory Body Formed Under Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972 Is Not a Voluntary Consumer Association or Consumer Under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appellant, Sobha Hibiscus Condominium, is a statutory body formed under the Karnataka Apartment Ownership Act, 1972, comprising owners of apartmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Upheld as Not Arbitrary or Perverse.

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. Trial Court's Discretion Not Found Arbitrary or Perverse in Restraining Use of Deceptively Similar Mark 'Shriphal'.

The appeal arises from an order of the trial court granting a temporary injunction in favor of the respondent/plaintiff, M/s Mysore Deep Perfumery Hou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd. v. Suresh Kumar Jasraj Burad. The court found that the marks 'MERELANE' and 'MARICELL' are deceptively similar and granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from using the mark 'MARICELL'.

The appellant, Parksons Cartamundi Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for infringement of its registered trademark 'MERELANE' and for passing off against the res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order in Civil Suit — No Jurisdictional Error Found in Rejection of Application Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The court held that the trial court's order was a plausible view and did not warrant interference under Article 227.

The petitioners, who are defendants in a civil suit, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated ...