Search Results for "Public Private Partnership"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Public Private Partnership"

868 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 868 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Ruling That Canteen Workers of Subsidiary Are Not Employees of Air India — Corporate Veil Not Lifted in Absence of Fraud. Workmen of Statutory Canteen Run by Wholly-Owned Subsidiary Under Factories Act Not Deemed Employees of Holding Company When No Direct Control or Sham Arrangement Proven.

1 Aug 2026

Background: The litigation arose from an industrial dispute raised by workmen employed by Chef Air, a unit of Hotel Corporation of India (HCI), who op...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Ban on Gutka and Pan Masala Containing Tobacco or Nicotine Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — Manufacturers' Challenge Dismissed. The court held that the definition of 'food' under Section 3(1)(j) of the FSS Act includes substances for chewing, and that the ban on food products containing tobacco or nicotine is valid and not ultra vires.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, manufacturers and sellers of gutka and pan masala containing tobacco or nicotine, challenged the validity of the ban imposed by the C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 89 of MRTP Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Prior Civil Court Decree Declaring Petitioner as Lessee and Not Trespasser Bars Corporation from Issuing Notice Under Different Act

19 Apr 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Iqbal & Brothers, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 2nd December 1997 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

6 Feb 2015

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.

20 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Strikes Down Section 87 of Arbitration Act as Unconstitutional — Automatic Stay of Arbitral Awards Revived by 2019 Amendment Held Arbitrary and Violative of Article 14. The court held that the provision reintroducing automatic stay upon filing of a Section 34 application is manifestly arbitrary and contrary to the object of the 2015 Amendment Act.

27 Nov 2019

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 87 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MIDC Circular Requiring 100% Completion of Work for Payment in Construction Contracts — Circular Held Unreasonable and Arbitrary Under Article 14 of Constitution of India. The court held that a circular requiring 100% completion of work before any payment is made is arbitrary and violative of Article 14, as it does not provide for payment for work done.

23 Oct 2020

The petitioner, M/s Mascot Construction Co., a partnership firm, challenged a Circular dated 27.08.2020 issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Developme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Inclusion of Dry Fruits Under APMC Act — Notifications Ultra Vires. Definition of Agricultural Produce Under Section 2(a) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963 is Exhaustive and Does Not Include Dry Fruits/Dry Dates.

17 Jun 2005

The petitioner, a partnership firm dealing in dry fruits and dry dates, challenged the validity of notifications dated 20.6.1988 and 18.10.1988 issued...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Sheets Against Cooperative Society and Chairman in CBI Bank Fraud Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC and Section 155(2) of Companies Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. The court held that prosecution for offences under the Companies Act requires prior sanction under Section 155(2), and in its absence, the charge sheets are liable to be quashed.

20 Feb 2019

The petitioners, M/s. Ghataprabha Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit (a cooperative society) and its Chairman, Lakhan Laxmanrao Jarkiholi, filed two wr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Occupancy Certificate and Refund of Security Deposit in CIDCO Development Dispute. Court holds that the developer failed to comply with development control regulations and that the petition was not maintainable due to disputed facts and alternative remedies.

27 Sep 2019

The petitioners, La'BuilDe Associates and its managing partner Bhagvanji Raiyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)