downloaded - 2026-06-17T111817.985
5 Mar 2026The two writ petitions filed by Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd challenged the vires of Rule 39(1)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and ...
Search Results for "Premature writ petition"
873 result(s) found
Found 873 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Examines Whether Settlement Commission Erred in Not Considering Export Performance During Extended Period in EPCG Duty Case. Appellant Sought Recalculation of Customs Duty Based on 30% Export Obligation Achieved, Arguing That One-Year Extension Was Not Properly Accounted.
19 Feb 2025The appellant, M/s. Asianet Satellite Communication Limited, a service provider in television network, imported cable TV equipment valued at Rs.6,14,3...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer of Taluk Health Officer. Petitioner's claim of minimum tenure of three years not supported by any statutory rule or government order.
26 Mar 2024The petitioner, Dr. Vidyavathi U. Patil, a dentist employed by the State Government, was posted as Taluk Health Officer, Kundgol on 02.01.2023. Her tr...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Reservation on Property Under Section 127(1) of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Petitioners' land reserved for road in development plan since 2002/2004 held to have lapsed as no acquisition proceedings were initiated within the statutory period.
24 Apr 2023The petitioners, owners of land bearing Sy. No. 466/2+3 at village Mehrun, Jalgaon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seekin...
- 17
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Ban on Transport of Banned Food Products Through Maharashtra. Inter-State Transport of Banned Products Not Prohibited Under Section 30(2)(a) of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
9 Jan 2021The petitioners, including the driver, cleaner, owner of a truck, and a transporter, challenged an order dated 15/7/2020 issued by the Food Safety Com...
- 73
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Orders Removing Principal In-Charge in Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Entitled to Continue as Principal In-Charge Pending Disposal of Writ Petition. The court held that orders passed without notice or hearing are void and directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to function as Principal In-Charge.
9 Jul 2020The petitioner, Smt. K.N. Sharadadevi, was appointed as Principal In-Charge of APS College of Arts and Science, Bengaluru, on 11.02.2020, being the se...
- 123
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.
24 Oct 2019The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...
- 211
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order Cancelling Grant of Land to Petitioners Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Lack of Notice. Deputy Commissioner's Suo Motu Cancellation of Grant Without Hearing Grantees Set Aside as Unauthorized and Contrary to Law.
22 Feb 2019The petitioners, Rudrappa and others, were granted agricultural land in Siddagondanahalli, Hosadurga Taluk, Chitradurga District, by the Deputy Commis...
- 74
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Order in Land Conversion Case — Violation of Natural Justice. Deputy Commissioner's order under Section 95 of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 set aside for lack of notice and opportunity of hearing to petitioners.
22 Feb 2019The petitioners, Rudrappa and others, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of K...
- 38
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition and Quashes Impugned Letter Declaring Reservation Lapsed Under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act. Court Holds That Failure to Initiate Acquisition Under Section 126 Within One Year of Confirmed Purchase Notice Leads to Automatic Lapse, and Deems Development Permission Granted Under Section 45(5) Due to Non-communication of Decision.
4 Dec 2017The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Beed town, challenged the continuing reservation of their land as a garden in the development plan of ...
