High Court of Karnataka Quashes Orders Removing Principal In-Charge in Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Entitled to Continue as Principal In-Charge Pending Disposal of Writ Petition. The court held that orders passed without notice or hearing are void and directed the respondents to allow the petitioner to function as Principal In-Charge.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 80
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. K.N. Sharadadevi, was appointed as Principal In-Charge of APS College of Arts and Science, Bengaluru, on 11.02.2020, being the senior-most faculty member. She was discharging her duties successfully. The fourth respondent, Dr. B. Jayashree, an Associate Professor in Physics, was junior to the petitioner and had been lobbying with the second respondent since 2017. The petitioner was aggrieved by two orders: one dated 12.03.2020 and another dated 18.05.2020 (Annexures A and B), which removed her from the post of Principal In-Charge. She filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of those orders and a direction to continue her as Principal In-Charge. The court noted that the impugned orders were passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The court held that no order adverse to a person can be passed without affording an opportunity of hearing. Consequently, the court quashed Annexures A and B and directed that the petitioner be continued as Principal In-Charge pending disposal of the writ petition. The court also directed the respondents to permit the petitioner to function as Principal In-Charge until further orders.

Headnote

A) Administrative Law - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Removal from Office - The petitioner, appointed as Principal In-Charge, was removed by orders dated 12.03.2020 and 18.05.2020 without any notice or opportunity of hearing - The court held that the orders were passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice and quashed them - Held that no order adverse to a person can be passed without affording an opportunity of hearing (Paras 4-5).

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - Interim Relief - The petitioner sought quashing of Annexures A and B and continuation as Principal In-Charge - The court, finding prima facie violation of natural justice, directed that the petitioner be continued as Principal In-Charge pending disposal of the writ petition - Held that interim protection is necessary to prevent irreparable injury (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the orders dated 12.03.2020 and 18.05.2020 removing the petitioner from the post of Principal In-Charge are liable to be quashed for violation of principles of natural justice?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court quashed Annexures A and B (orders dated 12.03.2020 and 18.05.2020) and directed that the petitioner be continued as Principal In-Charge of APS College of Arts and Science, Bengaluru, pending disposal of the writ petition. The respondents were directed to permit the petitioner to function as Principal In-Charge until further orders.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Writ Jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India
  • Interim Relief
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (07) 147

Writ Petition No.8655 of 2020 (S-RES)

2020-07-09

Justice Ashok S. Kinagi

Sri. Jagannath Prasad (for petitioner), Sri. Sandesh Kumar M., HCGP (for respondents)

Smt. K.N. Sharadadevi

The Government of Karnataka, The Joint Director of Collegiate Education, The General Secretary of Acharya Pathasala Education Trust, Dr. B. Jayashree

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders removing the petitioner from the post of Principal In-Charge without affording an opportunity of hearing.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of Annexures A and B (orders dated 12.03.2020 and 18.05.2020) and direction to continue the petitioner as Principal In-Charge.

Filing Reason

The petitioner was removed from the post of Principal In-Charge by orders dated 12.03.2020 and 18.05.2020 without any notice or opportunity of hearing, in violation of principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether the impugned orders dated 12.03.2020 and 18.05.2020 were passed in violation of principles of natural justice? Whether the petitioner is entitled to continue as Principal In-Charge pending disposal of the writ petition?

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner argued that the impugned orders were passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing, violating natural justice. The respondents did not file any counter or make submissions opposing the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Orders passed without affording an opportunity of hearing are in gross violation of principles of natural justice and are liable to be quashed. No order adverse to a person can be passed without giving him/her an opportunity of being heard.

Judgment Excerpts

The impugned orders are passed without any notice or opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The impugned orders are passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice. Hence, the impugned orders are liable to be quashed.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India on an unspecified date. The court heard the matter and passed the order on 09.07.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Orders Removing Principal In-Charge in Violation of Natural Justice — Petitioner Entitled to Continue as Principal In-Charge Pending Disposal of Writ Petition. The court held that orders passed without notice or hear...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions in Cheating Case — Conviction Under Section 420 IPC Upheld. Court finds concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence and no grounds for interference under revisional jurisdicti...