WRIT PETITION NO.323 OF 2000
18 Oct 2005Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various companies, including Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and India...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Act, 1951"
624 result(s) found
Found 624 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Political Party Secretary for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Section 56 Maharashtra Police Act Externment Cannot Be Used to Suppress Political Dissent Without Evidence of Threat to Public Order.
2 Jul 2026The petitioner, Saeed Ahmad Abdul Wahid Chaudhary, is the Secretary of the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI), a political party registered under...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction Regarding Witnesses' Unwillingness to Testify Under Section 56 of Bombay Police Act, 1951. The court held that the externment order must record the authority's subjective satisfaction that witnesses are unwilling to come forward to depose out of fear; absence of such satisfaction is fatal and vitiates the order.
27 Aug 2012The petitioner, Subhash Jethu Patil, challenged an externment order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Section 56(1)(a) and (b) of the Bombay P...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in COFEPOSA Detention Case, Upholding High Court's Refusal to Set Aside Order. The Court Found Compliance with Article 22(5) of the Constitution as Authorities Served Grounds in Bengali and Informed Detenue of Right to Representation Despite His Refusal, Based on Signed Panchnama and Diligent Attempts.
4 Jan 2024The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the brother-in-law of a detenue challenging a detention order under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prev...
- 650
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Copyright Infringement Case, Restrains Defendants from Selling Allegedly Copied Books. Court finds prima facie case of substantial copying of plaintiff's literary works on Indian Economy and Polity by former students.
25 Oct 2024The appellant, Ranjan Vasudeo Kolambe, filed a Commercial Appeal From Order under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging the judgm...
- 331
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in POCSO and IPC Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Minor Inconsistencies. Medical Evidence Corroborates Sexual Assault; Extortion and Criminal Intimidation Charges Sustained Under Sections 384 and 506 IPC.
10 Jan 2019The appellant, Sandip Hariprasad Pande, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Child Protection Case No.63/2015 for offences under Sect...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Cancellation of FL-III Liquor License for Breach of Rules. Licensee failed to appear at hearing despite show cause notice, leading to confirmation of cancellation by Single Judge and Division Bench.
29 Jul 2021The appellant, Ramkishor S/o Nathulal Jaiswal, was the proprietor of M/s. J. B. Restaurant holding an FL-III license under the Bombay Foreign Liquor R...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Lack of Material to Show Petitioner as 'Dangerous Person' Under Section 56(1)(b). Externment order set aside as the subjective satisfaction of the authority was not based on credible material and the order was passed without proper application of mind.
19 Jul 2017The petitioner, Rohit s/o Ramesh Nalawade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the final order dated 02.05.2017 pa...
- 69
High Court
High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder and Assault Case; Ocular Testimony Not Corroborated by Medical Evidence and Contradictions in Time of Injuries Led to Benefit of Doubt Under Sections 302/149 IPC and Bombay Police Act.
2 Apr 2018The State of Maharashtra filed Criminal Appeal No. 618 of 2002 against the judgment and order dated 21.06.2002 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.
28 Aug 2013The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...
- 129
