Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority"

1036 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1036 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Cancellation of Flat Allotment for Non-Payment Due to Non-Issuance of Demand Letter. Petitioner's Allotment Cannot Be Cancelled Without Issuance of Formal Demand Letter Under Regulation 18(1) of MHADA (Disposal of Land) Regulations, 1992.

12 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Sandeep Uttam Bodke, applied for allotment of a flat under the Lower Income Group (LIG) category in response to an advertisement issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Slum Rehabilitation Authority. Court holds that developer's unilateral action of obtaining SRA approval for redevelopment on petitioner's plot without consent does not warrant interim relief under Section 9 of Arbitration Act as the agreement contained arbitration clause and petitioner failed to show irreparable injury.

4 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jai Neptune Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as the development agreement did not grant possession.

4 Mar 2016

The appellants, Prajita Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order dated 14.01.2016 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Co...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Revision Against Trial Court’s Rejection of Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Arising Out of Suit Challenging Municipal Demolition Notices. Suit Raises Question on Applicability of Bar of Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 433A of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

21 Nov 2025

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by a tenant occupying a shop structure in Nashik. The plaintiff claimed that the private defendants, who pur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Inclusion of Voters in Cooperative Society Election, Upholds Bar Under Rule 78 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Elections to Committee) Rules, 2014. Remedy of Election Petition Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Held to Be Exclusive and Bar Writ Jurisdiction.

15 Jun 2015

The petitioners, members of Shivanand Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act as Award Not Found to be Patently Illegal or Contrary to Public Policy. The Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Interpretation of the Development Agreement Was Plausible and Did Not Warrant Setting Aside.

6 Apr 2026

The judgment pertains to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30th Sep...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of Writ Petition (L) No. 30829 of 2024. The petition involved multiple parties including the State of Maharashtra and several private respondents.

8 May 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging GST Detention Order — Petitioner Failed to Produce E-Way Bill or Invoice at Time of Inspection, Detention Upheld Under Section 129 of MGST Act, 2017.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Velentine Properties Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the detention of its goods and vehicle by the State of Maharas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Slum Land Acquisition Notification for Non-Compliance with Section 14(1) of Maharashtra Slum Act. Land Owner's Property Acquired Without Proper Application by SRA and Without Opportunity of Hearing.

17 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Deena Pramod Baldota, is the owner of land bearing CTS No.355 (part) and other sub-numbers admeasuring about 5115.2 sq. meters situate...

51 52 53 54 55

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)