Search Results for "Licence fee"

751 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 751 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender Award for Non-Submission of Performance Bank Guarantee. Tender Conditions Requiring Strict Compliance with Time Limits for Furnishing Bank Guarantee and Letter of Acceptance Are Valid and Enforceable.

The petitioner, Proactive In & Out Advertising Pvt. Ltd., challenged the cancellation of a tender award by Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Ltd. (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal and Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Rider Upheld, Income Reassessed at Rs.15,000 per Month. The court applied multiplier 18 and added 40% future prospects under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, enhancing award from Rs.17,25,000 to Rs.28,08,000.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai, dated 18.10.2019 in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.5431 of 2016. The appellants, bei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Borrower's Waiver Challenge and ARCL's Interest Inclusion Petitions in SARFAESI Appeal Pre-Deposit Dispute. The Court reduced pre-deposit from 50% to 25% of debt due including interest, balancing the borrower's right to appeal and the secured creditor's interests.

The case involves cross-petitions arising from a common DRAT order dated 04 June 2024. The borrower, M/s Royal Traders, challenged the DRAT's refusal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...