Search Results for "Land Disposal Policy"

1004 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1004 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Municipal Council's Appeal in Land Allotment Dispute — Sanction of State Government Required Under Section 109 of Madhya Pradesh Municipality Act, 1961. High Court Erred in Quashing Collector's Order Without Considering Mandatory Previous Sanction.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Municipal Council, Neemuch, against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court which had quashed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Developer Selection in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Tenants of Municipal Corporation Held Ineligible to Vote. The court upheld the selection of developer by General Body Meeting, finding no procedural irregularity in service of notice or conduct of meeting.

The petitioners, claiming to be eligible slum dwellers, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.7 as developer for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.

The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxability of Interest Received on Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation. Petitioner Claims Interest is Capital Receipt and Not Taxable; Revenue Relies on Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a 48-year-old man rendered paraplegic and bedridden since a road accident at age 8, filed a writ petition challenging the taxability o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Challenge" "Justice Arif S. Doctor condones a 14-day delay in filing under Section 34, interpreting procedural requirements for signed arbitral awards in light of mandatory statute compliance."

1. Introduction and Parties The case involves the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) as the petitioner and Mumbai Metro One Pvt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Redetermination of Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act — Collector Directed to Consider Application and Pass Award Within Three Months. Petitioner's Right to Seek Higher Compensation Based on Subsequent Award in Reference Case Upheld.

The petitioner, Sk. Allauddin, owned agricultural land bearing Gat No. 25 at Ellora, which was acquired by a notification dated 12.03.1991 under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Section 28A Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 90 Days for Seeking Redetermination of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The petitioner, Mrs. Zainabi, challenged the orders dated 14th May 2010 and 15th June 2012 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore D...