Search Results for "tax entry"

1512 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1512 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Same Material Considered in Original Scrutiny Assessment is Invalid.

The petitioner, Clear Media (India) Private Limited, a company engaged in FM Radio Broadcasting, filed its return of income for the assessment year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Block Assessment Case — Unexplained Investments Not Proven as Income. The court held that the Assessing Officer failed to establish that the cash credits and investments belonged to the assessee, and the ITAT correctly deleted the additions.

The case involves appeals by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dansinh Rupsinh Parmar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Second Fast Track Court, Amreli in Special Case (ACB) No. 47/19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging GST Summons — Summons for Oral Evidence Held Valid. No Violation of Article 20(3) as Petitioner Not an Accused at Investigation Stage; Alternative Remedy Available Under CGST Act.

The petitioners, JSK Marketing Limited and its Managing Director, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Maharashtra Excise Notifications Discriminating Against Imported Wines. Petitioner contends that the impugned notifications violate GATT national treatment principle and constitutional rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 253.

The writ petition before the Bombay High Court involved a challenge by an importer of foreign wines, holding an FL-I licence, to several notifications...