High Court of Karnataka Writ Petition (PIL) – Cause Title Only. No substantive judgment text provided.
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "resolution plan approval"
742 result(s) found
Found 742 result(s)
High Court
- 41
High Court
- 50
High Court
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Section 9 Order for Handing Over Flats for Redevelopment — Holds That Disputed Possession Cannot Be Directed Without Final Determination of Rights in Arbitration. The court set aside the order directing possession and directed status quo pending arbitration under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
14 Nov 2025The case involves a dispute between M/s. Rajendra Builders (appellant no.1), the original developer of a building owned by Borivali Amita Co-operative...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.
4 May 2018The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Rejection of Building Proposal for Non-Compliance with DCR and Non-Refund of Deposit. Court upholds SRA's decision that the proposal was not in conformity with Development Control Regulations and that the deposit was not refundable as per the terms of the Letter of Intent.
25 Nov 2022The petitioner, Siddharth Constructions, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the deci...
- 114
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Grant of Scheme to Another Developer. Court upholds SRA's decision based on eligibility criteria and policy, finding no arbitrariness or violation of principles of natural justice.
22 Dec 2020The Petitioners, Dyna Estate Pvt. Ltd. (a developer) and Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Nagar Sahakari Griha Nirman Sanstha (a proposed cooperative society of...
- 35
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Child Custody Case, Setting Aside High Court's Habeas Corpus Order. The Court Held that Habeas Corpus is Not Appropriate for Custody Disputes and the Welfare of the Child is Paramount Under Section 6 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, Requiring a Fresh Assessment by a Family Court.
12 Jan 2022The appeal arose from a dispute between a wife (appellant no.1) and husband (respondent no.1) over the custody of their minor son, a US citizen born i...
- 433
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Franchisee's Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Franchise Dispute. Court holds that arbitration clause providing for three arbitrators with franchisor appointing one arbitrator is valid and not unconscionable, and that Section 9 petition is not maintainable as the arbitration agreement provides for a specific mechanism for appointment of arbitrators.
13 Feb 2012The petitioner, Karan Sahgal, a franchisee, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief agai...
- 133
