KAHC010451182019_1
14 Feb 2020...
Search Results for "residential order"
3484 result(s) found
Found 3484 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Tenancy and Partnership Dispute Under U.P. Urban Buildings Act and Partnership Act. The Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of a review application, noting partnership dissolution upon partners' deaths but not altering the tenancy outcome based on deemed vacancy provisions.
10 Aug 2021The dispute originated from an application filed in July 1982 by Pradeep Kumar, the successor-in-interest of tenant Tika Ram, before the Rent Control ...
- 328
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition of Allottee in KIADB Act Case — Condition Requiring Prior Permission for Share Transfer Declared Ultra Vires. The Court held that the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board cannot impose restrictions on transfer of shares of an allottee company as such power is not conferred by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966.
12 Jan 2024The petitioner, M/s. Kamalalayaa Real Estates LLP, a limited liability partnership firm, was allotted land by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Developme...
- 261
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Over Sanction of Group Housing Project Permissions. Petition Challenges Conversion Sanad and Construction License Under Goa Town and Country Planning Laws.
27 Sep 2018The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation filed by Betqui Candola Samvardhan Samitee, a society of villagers, challenging permissions granted t...
- 34
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Assistant Commissioner's Order in SC/ST Act Case for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction. Order passed without notice to petitioners and without proper inquiry under Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
15 Mar 2021The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 18.02.2020 passed...
- 127
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Appeals Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Challenge to Land Acquisition under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966. The Appeals Concern the Validity of Acquisition Proceedings for an Industrial Area Based on Clearance Granted by State High Level Committee Before the Enactment of the Karnataka Industries (Facilitation) Act, 2002.
10 Apr 2026The matter arose from a batch of writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka against the common order dated 19.11.2012 of a learned Single J...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes ULC Act Demand for Entire Land Area Including Vacant Land — Demand Must Be Limited to Built-Up Area Only. The court held that under the repealed Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, a demand for payment cannot include vacant land as per the Section 20 Exemption Order Schedule.
9 Aug 2023The petitioners challenged a demand of Rs 6,09,66,477 raised by the District Collector and Competent Authority under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regul...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Incentive FSI for Redevelopment of Cessed Buildings in Mumbai — Directs Strict Compliance with Safety and Environmental Norms. The court held that DCR 33(7) is valid but must be implemented with safeguards to prevent urban disruption and protect the right to life under Article 21.
17 Oct 2005The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by three citizens of Mumbai challenging the validity of Development Control Regulation 33(7) which gran...
- 243
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award in Favour of Workman in Date of Birth Dispute — Employer's Superannuation of Workman Set Aside. Re-instatement with Full Back-wages and Continuity of Service Ordered as Employer Failed to Prove Correct Date of Birth.
23 Mar 2017The petitioner, M/s. Hindalco Industries Limited, Belgaum, through its Senior Vice President, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the ...
- 61
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Writ Petition Challenging Administrative Tribunal Orders in Mundkarial Dispute. Key Issue Whether Mamlatdar Had Jurisdiction to Determine Mundkarial Rights When Reference Was Made Under Section 32 of the Goa, Daman and Diu Mundkars (Protection from Eviction) Act, 1975.
4 May 2018The litigation originated from two civil suits filed in 1992 by M/s. Suvarn Rajaram Bandekar Discretionary Trust against one Armando Cardozo for remov...
- 52
