Search Results for "reserved area"

4755 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4755 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. The court held that failure to acquire reserved land within the statutory period results in automatic lapsing of reservation and release of land to the owner.

The petitioner, Siddharam Shivappa Patil, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.

This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Delivers Judgment in Writ Petition Challenging Revocation of Slaughter Licenses by Municipal Corporation; Questions of Arbitrariness and Natural Justice Violation Examined Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.

The Bombay Suburban Khatik Association, an association of butchers and mutton vendors, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench Hears Letters Patent Appeal Challenging Single Judge Order on RTI Act Applicability to APMC. The appeal raises the question whether Agricultural Produce Market Committee is a public authority under Section 2(h) RTI Act.

Background: The appeal arose from a writ petition filed by the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Arvi, challenging an order of the State I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Unilateral Modification of Development Control Regulations by State. Held that DCRs are statutory and cannot be altered without following due process under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by D B Realty Limited and Salim Balwa (WP No.366 of 2014) and Savita Homemakers LLP and Akkshay Jain (W...