Search Results for "Tribunal error"

4679 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4679 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Lecturer with Dual Employment. Income Reassessed at Rs.15,000 per Month Based on Minimum Wages for Graduate, Enhancing Compensation from Rs.12.93 Lakhs to Rs.21.40 Lakhs.

The appellant, father of deceased Bhaveshbhai Faldu, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation of Rs.75,00,000 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Raman & Raman Ltd. in Stage Carriage Permit Matter, Quashing Appellate Authority's Order. Section 43A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, Holds Only Administrative Power; Directions Issued Are Not Law and Cannot Affect Prior Permits.

The appellant, M/s. Raman & Raman Ltd., was one of several applicants for a stage carriage permit. The Regional Transport Authority granted the permit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Homemaker Deceased — Reduces Compensation Due to Erroneous Future Prospects and Income Assessment. Future Prospects Capped at 40% Under Pranay Shethi Principles and Notional Income Reduced to Rs.10,000 Per Month.

The appeal was filed by IFFCO TOKIO General Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 15.02.2024 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Regular Second Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Regarding Poojaraki Rights and Injunction. Appeal Filed by Defendants Against Concurrent Decrees of Lower Courts Partly Decreeing Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction.

The case concerned a dispute among the Bhavi family members, who are hereditary pujaris of the Prabhudev temple in Terdal, Jamakhandi. The plaintiffs,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order in DMER Additional Charge Dispute — Acquiescence and Lack of Legal Right to Additional Charge. Restoration of Additional Charge to Petitioner Upheld as Respondent Failed to Challenge Initial Order for Over Two Years.

The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, considered the challenge to a judgment of the Maharashtra Administrat...