Search Results for "Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction"

6268 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6268 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956.

The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Criminal Complaint Case for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 195 CrPC. Private Complaint Not Maintainable for Offences Under Sections 191-192 IPC Committed in Judicial Proceedings.

The case arises from two criminal complaints filed by M/s Bandekar Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and another against Prasad Vassudev Keni and others under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Execution of Arbitral Award Without Decree — Arbitral Award Cannot Be Executed Directly Under Section 38 CPC Without Prior Decree Under Section 36 of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sri Chandrashekhar, was the judgment debtor in execution proceedings before the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Mysore. The dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Recovery Suit for Cotton Price and Interest — Contract Deemed Accepted Under Clause 33. The court held that the defendant was liable to pay the price of cotton bales and other charges with interest at 20% per annum.

The plaintiff, The Cotton Corporation of India Ltd., filed a suit for recovery of Rs.15,78,006.49 along with interest at 20% per annum against the def...