Search Results for "Maharashtra Public Records Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Public Records Act"

3645 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3645 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

29 Jan 2014

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

High Court

Bombay High Court Scrutinizes Preventive Detention Orders Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. Petitions Allege Mechanical Approval and Failure to Establish Threat to Public Order Under Section 3 and Section 12.

30 Sep 2025

These criminal writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, arose from preventive detention orders issued under the Maharashtra Preventi...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by GPA Holder in Land Acquisition Case — No Locus Standi to Challenge Acquisition Under KIAD Act. The Court held that a GPA holder cannot maintain a writ petition challenging land acquisition under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966, as he has no independent right and the owner had already received compensation.

3 Dec 2025

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Jemcy Ponnappa C.P. and Casuba Infrastructure and Development Company against the State of Karnataka and othe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Constitutional Validity of Section 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Act Inserted by Maharashtra Act XVI of 1995. Petitioners Challenge Retrospective Withdrawal of Sales Tax Deferral Incentives Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1983, as Ultra Vires Constitution and Violative of Promissory Estoppel.

20 Aug 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Suspension of Orthopedic Surgeons Under PCPNDT Act for Mandatory Suspension Upon Framing of Charges. Section 23(2) of the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 mandates suspension of registration of medical practitioners upon framing of charges by a court, with no discretion for the State Medical Council.

23 Aug 2013

The petitioners, Dr. Ramineni Venugopal Somaiah and Dr. Prabhudas Solanki, both orthopedic surgeons, challenged an order of the Maharashtra Medical Co...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.388 OF 2016

19 Dec 2016

The petitioners, a company importing and supplying ATMs to State Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challengin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Consolidated Writ Appeals Challenging Acquisition Proceedings by Bangalore Development Authority. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the Single Judge's order dated 06.06.2006 that upheld the preliminary and final notifications for acquisition of lands.

3 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit for Unauthorized Subletting. Concurrent findings of fact that tenant sublet premises without landlord's consent under Section 15 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, upheld.

8 Mar 2013

The Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), a statutory body, was a monthly tenant of a godown premises in Mumbai owned by the respondents (la...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Accused in Section 138 NI Act Case — Cheque Not Drawn on Accused's Account. Applicant cannot be held vicariously liable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as the cheque was drawn on the account of a proprietorship firm, not on the personal account of the accused.

12 Feb 2016

The applicant, Dr. (Mrs) Rajul Ketan Raj, was accused no.1 in three complaints filed by Reliance Capital Ltd. under Section 138 of the Negotiable Inst...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Armed Forces Tribunal Orders Under Article 226. High Court reversed Tribunal orders and granted relief; statutory appeal mechanism under Sections 30 and 31 of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 argued to exclude writ jurisdiction.

1 Aug 2026

In these connected civil appeals, the Supreme Court was confronted with the issue of maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Consti...

50 51 52 53 54

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)