Search Results for "Bombay High Court guidelines"

3068 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3068 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against Industrial Court Order Dismissing Revision as Time-Barred. Limitation for Revision Under Section 44 of MRTU & PULP Act is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers and worked from 1979 to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Challenge to DRI's Investigation and Letters Rogatory in Coal Import Over-Valuation Case. Petitioner Argues Non-Cognizable Offences Require Magistrate Order under CrPC, Rendering Letters Rogatory Invalid.

The present writ petition before the Bombay High Court arises from an investigation initiated by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Bona Fide Need for Hotel Business Established. Landlord's son's need for premises to start hotel business held genuine and reasonable under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the applicants (original defendants) for possession of suit p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence in POCSO and Murder Case. The Trial Court Convicted the Accused for Rape and Murder of his Minor Daughter, Imposing Death Sentence Requiring High Court Confirmation under Section 366(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

The case arose from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Police Station Kalamna, Nagpur, initially for offences under Sections 305, 306, 376 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Revision Applications as Time-Barred Under MRTU & PULP Act. Limitation for Revision under Section 44 is Governed by Article 137 of Limitation Act, Not Article 113.

The petitioners, employees of the Irrigation Project, Ratnagiri, were appointed as River Gauge Readers and Rain Gauge Readers between 1979 and 1991. T...