Search Results for "tribunal’s findings"

4740 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4740 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition in School Termination Case — Termination Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of M.E.P.S. Act Void. Reinstatement with Continuity Upheld, Back Wages Denied as Employee Did Not Work.

The case involves a challenge by the management of a private school (Shamin Azad Education Society and others) against the judgment of the School Trib...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Pillion Rider Injured in Tractor Collision — Tribunal's Deduction for Contributory Negligence Set Aside as No Evidence of Rider's Fault.

The appellant, Rupasangji Ravaji Thakor, was a pillion rider on a motorcycle when a tractor driven rashly and negligently dashed into the motorcycle f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Wakf Tribunal’s Ex Parte Order for Violation of Natural Justice; Remands Matter for Fresh Hearing. Tribunal Quashed Elections of Mutawallis Without Ensuring Proper Service of Notice, Contradicting Principles of Fair Hearing Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from elections to the managing committee (Mutawallis) of Tembhi Naka Muslim Jamat Masjid, Thane, a Wakf governed by the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Sets Aside Tribunal's Interim Stay on Transfer of IAS Officer, Holding It Violative of Section 24 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. Transfer Order Passed in Administrative Exigency After Preliminary Enquiry Revealed Financial Irregularities, Not Vitiated by Mala Fides.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bombay Bran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...