Search Results for "taxable person"

654 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 654 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Cancellation Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Registration Cancelled Without Proper Notice and Opportunity of Hearing, Set Aside with Restoration.

The petitioner, Rawman Metal & Alloys, a proprietorship concern, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Declaring Licence Fees Ultra Vires under U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. Imposition of Rs. 30/- and Rs. 51/- Licence Fees on Rickshaw Owners and Drivers Lacked Sufficient Quid Pro Quo, Rendering Bye-Laws Invalid.

The dispute arose from bye-laws framed by the Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi (Municipal Board) under the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, imposing annual li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue in Income Tax Reassessment Case on Limitation and Computation Grounds. Reassessment under Sections 147 and 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Valid as Assessee Failed to Disclose Material Facts, and Notice Served on Partnership Firm Was Proper Despite Section 282(2) Argument.

The dispute arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income Tax Act, 1961, involving a partnership firm engaged in publishing newspapers and peri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blocking of Input Tax Credit Under Rule 86-A of CGST/MGST Rules for Violation of Natural Justice. Prior Hearing Mandated Before Blocking Credit Under Rule 86-A.

The petitioner, Ashapura Steel Metal, through its proprietor Velaram Viraji Choudhary, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Penalty Deletion Upheld for Bonafide Claims. Claims for deduction under Section 35D and diminution in value of shares were bonafide and not concealment, following CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appel...