Search Results for "section 376"

1813 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1813 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Corroborate Prosecution Case. Conviction under Section 376 IPC for rape of a 13-year-old girl in a shop confirmed, with sentence of 7 years RI and fine.

The appellant, Arvind Bhagwant Datal, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for offences under Sections 376 and 342 of the Indian Pen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Rape Case Due to Compromise and Marriage Between Parties — No Prima Facie Case Found as Couple Living Together.

The petitioner, Ravindra Laxman Ghogardare, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking quashing of FIR No. I266...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 506 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shrirampur in Sessions Case No. 75 of 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Criminal Intimidation in Repeated Sexual Assault Case. Victim's Testimony Found Credible Despite Delay in FIR, Medical Evidence of Pregnancy Corroborates Prosecution Case Under Sections 376 and 506(i) IPC.

The appellant, Mahadev Kondiba Jagtap, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.306 of 2009 for offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Devidas Malche, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No.25 of 2014 for the offence punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Rape of Minor Case — Victim's Testimony Found Credible. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act upheld as medical evidence and prompt FIR corroborate victim's account.

The appellant, Ganesh Laxman Madne, was convicted by the Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal, in Special Case No.44/2015 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed Complaint. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mansoor @ Ismail, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, in S.C.No.136/2011 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by appellants Pratik, Sudesh, Prithviraj, Munna, and Chhotu against their convictions by the Assistant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside

The appellant, Chandrakant @ Chavhan s/o Deorao Bhujade, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, for offences under Sections...