Search Results for "revenue mutation"

1025 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1025 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Ramdas Kalmegh, was a Patwari at Pimpri-Deshmukh, Maharashtra. The complainant, Raghunath Tandale, owned agricultural land and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Revenue Circle Officer in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Independent Panch Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rajaram Banderao Kulkarni, was a Revenue Circle Officer at Pangari, Taluka Barshi, District Solapur. On 24 May 1994, the complainant (P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Quashing of FIR Against Trustees for Alleged Misappropriation of Trust Land. Absence of Dishonest Intention and Individual Ownership of Sold Property Raised to Negate Offences Under Sections 420, 406, 467, 471 IPC and Sections 66A, 67 MPT Act.

The case involved two criminal applications filed by former office-bearers of a public trust before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of an FIR a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Ex Parte Mutation Order Due to Lack of Notice. Section 232(3) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 invoked to set aside order passed without proper service.

The petitioner, Vyankatesh s/o Ramaswami Reddy, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 1/3/2011 passed by the District Superintendent of Lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Government Order Denying Regrant to Dalit Allottee in Watan Land Dispute. Occupancy Price Paid within Prescribed Period under Bombay Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1958 Entities Allottee to Regrant as Authorised Holder.

The dispute arose from a claim for regrant of service inam watan lands under the Bombay Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1958. Originally, the l...