Search Results for "reasoning"

897 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 897 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in Murder and Wrongful Restraint Case, Upholding Life Imprisonment. Conviction Under Sections 302 and 341 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Was Sustained Based on Prosecution Evidence and Concurrent Findings of Lower Courts.

The appeal arose from a criminal case involving the appellant, accused No. 1, who was convicted for offences under Sections 302 and 341 of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Identification and Lack of Corroborative Evidence. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Identification Process Was Flawed.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Udayakumar (A-2) against his conviction for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The appellan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Tax Assessment Case Due to Invalid Service of Assessment Orders. Recovery Proceedings Under Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 Quashed as Assessment Orders for 2009-10 and 2010-11 Were Not Served as Per Rule 64 of Telangana VAT Rules, Making Enforcement Unlawful.

The dispute involved a tax assessment and recovery case between the revenue authorities and an assessee company. The revenue had issued assessment ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Jurisdiction Finding in GST Notification Challenge. High Court of Sikkim Lacked Territorial Jurisdiction as Cause of Action for Challenging Goa's GST Notification Arose in Goa, Not Sikkim, Under Article 226(2) of the Constitution.

The dispute originated from writ petitions filed before the High Court of Sikkim by a private limited company engaged in the lottery ticket business, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act. Acquisition Does Not Lapse as Possession Was Taken, Applying Constitution Bench Interpretation That 'Or' in Section 24(2) Means 'Nor' or 'And', Overruling Pune Municipal Corporation Precedent.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case where the High Court of Delhi allowed a writ petition, declaring the acquisition deemed to have lapsed ...